So I’m getting my weekly Irshad Manji fix, hoping against hope that her latest post will contain at least some insight into the latest FAILgate, The Jewel of Medina’s failure to get to print. And I’m not disappointed:
I promised you the link to my commentary about the novel that Random House New York has cancelled out of sheer fear.
SHEER FEAR!! It’s like, Random House started to print the book, and then everyone crapped their pants and were all “OMG!!11! ALL THE MOOOZLIMS GONNA GO ‘SPLODEY UP IN HERE!”
I digress. Through the magic of the interwebs, a single click and we’re immersed in Irshad’s alternate universe:
In this season of political conventions, Americans are beginning to focus on who should lead the “land of the free and home of the brave.” But does the United States deserve a descriptor drenched in the language of conscience and courage? It’s increasingly dubious.
I want to be honest with you. I feed a certain degree of affection for Sr. Irshad–it’s true. I admit a part of me even has a platonic crush on her, although the Almighty knows I ain’t her type. Nothing haram, mind you, just a general appreciation for what I know is a sharp mind that has massive capabilities and untapped potential. And it’s with that in mind that I need to say, very clearly now, that that is without a doubt the dumbest paragraph I’ve ever seen her write. And that’s saying something.
Let’s forget for a second the rest of the article, wherein she seems to forget what would seem to be a pretty important fact–that negative reviews of The Jewel of Medina also focussed on its gross historical inaccuracies and shoddy scholarship, especially given its claim that it is “extensively researched.” Forgive my lady that wee oversight, will you? and re-read that last sentence:
But does the United States deserve a descriptor drenched in the language of conscience and courage? It’s increasingly dubious.
I’m struggling to discover what she’s actually saying here, not because it isn’t clear, but because there’s a war inside me to reconcile my tiny crush on Irshad with the realisation that even from her mighty pen can come such mind-numbing stupid. Is it increasingly dubious that the US isn’t a state of conscience and courage? Just because Random House exercised its right in the free market to choose not to publish a book it didn’t want to publish?
Come on, Sr. Irshad. Surely you know better, mitha. One might say the US isn’t a state of conscience and courage because it’s run by a bunch of chickenhawks who wage wars they’d never dare fight themselves, and who don’t have the moral courage to see the folly of the past couple of centuries of failed foreign policies that have, without exception, made the world as a whole a place far, far worse off and more dangerous than it would’ve been had the US never interfered. That’s one thing, and although I don’t necessarily agree, it would strike me only as incorrect rather than incoherent.